Evaluate on facts, award with proof
Once bids are opened, the team sees for each bid what complies, what is missing and what contradicts itself. The award belongs to an approver, and every step stays on file.
Tenders › AO-2026-014 › Bids
Example
| Bidder | Requirements | Glory’s analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Company A | All valid | Nothing to report |
| Company B | All valid | Total ≠ declared price (p. 3) |
| Company C | Tax clearance missing | Conflicting lead times (p. 2 and 7) |
Company A
- Requirements
- All valid
- Glory’s analysis
- Nothing to report
Company B
- Requirements
- All valid
- Glory’s analysis
- Total ≠ declared price (p. 3)
Company C
- Requirements
- Tax clearance missing
- Glory’s analysis
- Conflicting lead times (p. 2 and 7)
What you can do
Requirements line by line
For each supplier, every requirement is valid, missing, expired or awaiting verification, by the rules and never by AI.
Bid analysis
Glory lists each bid’s missing documents, calculation errors and contradictions, citing the file and page.
Award by an approver
Only an approver or owner awards, after the deadline, with a code and their authenticator.
Tender history
Publication, deadline moves, opening, award: a timeline drawn from the audit trail.
An award file ready for audit
What your tender committee or internal audit will ask for is already recorded.
- Who opened the bids, when, and their declaration of no link
- The analysis report of each bid, kept in versions and readable as PDF
- The award decision, its author and its confirmation
- The answers and amendments published during the tender
Let’s talk about your first pilot site
A demo on one of your past tenders, with your compliance team. Write to us at contact@pamojabid.com.